There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
951 CICOM/A/E/23/00350 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 19-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01017 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "To The FAA, CIC, New Delhi. As anticipated, the so called reply provided by CPIO makes no legal sense in itself and not replied not in accordance with the very content of RTI in question and hence, this Appeal." DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
952 CICOM/A/E/23/00348 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 15-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00787 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Sub:- First Appeal against reply of CPIO on RTI application no. CICOM/R/E/23/00787 dt. 12/07/2023 Refer to our RTI Application no. CICOM/R/E/23/00787 dt. 12/07/2023 (Copy enclosed) the reply received from CPIO dt. 10/08/2023 but File No. 2023/CIC/ADMN/RTI dt. 28th March 2023 (Copy enclosed) Is does not pertain to my RTI rather it is of some different RTI of some other applicant. The suitable directions may be issued to the CPIO to reply to the questions raise by me in my RTI application." DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO (Admin Section) is directed to revisit the RTI application and provide information as per available records, as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 20.10.2023, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
953 CICOM/A/P/23/00140 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 15-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00438 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “CPIO has been provided the information about two letters dated 06/03/2023 & 06/04/2023 but not mentioned the third letter dated 15/05/2023. Name, Designation of Officers/Official who orders to link these letters to the file has not been mentioned. Who hold the file.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
954 CICOM/A/E/23/00347 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 14-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00929 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Sir I am sought an appeal under section 19 of RTI act because CPIO cum legal cell, shri U.S .kanyal( section officer) CIc,new Delhi has not been provided any information as written at online RTI portal / e- mail or mention address as per RTI request dt 12.8.023within stipulated period under provision of RTI act. Enclosed-an written Appeal." DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
955 CICOM/A/E/23/00345 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00958 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "The CPIO give incomplete information, as no inspection of file was allowed to me as requested in my RTI application." DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to revisit the RTI application, as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 20.10.2023. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
956 CICOM/A/E/23/00346 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00930 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Sir kindly to be admitted an appeal under section 19 of RTI act - Ground are below as on:- 1. CPIO has been provided any information as per request dt 12.8 23 through online/ email or other mode. Yet. 2. CPIO has been provided any information within stipulated period under provision of the RTI act. 3. CPIO has not response according to law and RTI rules. Regards Hence sir please directioted to CPIO to furnish asked information as per request. I shall be everpray to you for kindness of the Act." DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, the information has already been shared by the CPIO on 12.09.2023 on email . Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
957 CICOM/A/P/23/00133 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00328 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
958 CICOM/A/P/23/00134 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00389 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Not yet received RTI reply from your office in the matter of RTI Application dated 22-08-2023. Copy of RTI Application dated 22-07-2023 is attached herewith. Deemed refusal to reply – RTI application dated 22-07-2023 delivered at your office on 24/07/2023 vide Speed post No EM 684829334IN at 14:59:55.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO furnished reply to the RTI application on 30.08.2023 i.e. within the prescribed time limit as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, but as mentioned by the appellant in the first appeal of non-receipt of the reply, a copy of the RTI reply is being attached with this order. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
959 CICOM/A/P/23/00135 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-09-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/2023/00380 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
960 CICOM/A/P/23/00136 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-09-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/2023/00337 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA