There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1991 CICOM/A/E/21/00231 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 30-10-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/21/00937 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारियों द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1992 CICOM/A/E/21/00230 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-10-2021 REFERENCE: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00828 dated 06.09.2021. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal dated 28.10.2021 seeking present status of each of his above-cited five second appeals. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition dated 28.10.2021, RTI application dated 06.09.2021 and replies given by CPIOs of CIC have been perused. The CPIOs have correctly informed the appellant that as and when a date is fixed for 2nd Appeal hearing, intimation would be sent to the appellant. The status of appeals/ complaints can also known from the website of CIC. (www.cic.gov.in). Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of FAA-CIC in the matter. NA
1993 CICOM/A/P/21/00118 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-10-2021 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/21/00383 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1994 CICOM/A/P/21/00117 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 25-10-2021 Decision of the First Appellate Authority, CIC in respect of RTI No.CICOM/R/P/21/00432 is attached for perusal please. download pdf
1995 CICOM/A/E/21/00229 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 24-10-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00907 dated 25.09.2021. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeals dated 21.10.2021 & 24.10.2021 seeking i) Whether any date for Hearing fixed by CIC with regard to admitted cases; ii) Copies of any record, written statement / counter affidavit submitted by the respondents in the aforesaid matters. iii) In what circumstances the Deputy Registrar (CR), CIC has returned my Second appeal dated 12.10.2021 against CPIO, SCI. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition dated 24.10.2021, RTI application dated 25.09.2021 and replies given by CPIO (IC-SC) and CPIO (RTI Cell) of CIC have been perused. Part (i) & (ii) of grounds of first appeal have been disposed off by FAA-CIC on 18.11.2021. A copy of decision of FAA-CIC of First Appeal No.CICOM/A/E/21/00226 dated 21.10.2021 is enclosed for ready reference. With regard to part (iii) of first appeal dated 24.10.2021, it is observed that the second appeal of the appellant had been returned advising to file First Appeal in Supreme Court of India prior to approaching CIC for second appeal. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of FAA-CIC in the matter. NA
1996 CICOM/A/E/21/00228 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 23-10-2021 Reference: RTI No. CICOM/R/E/21/00837 dated 08.09.2021. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition dated 23.10.2021, RTI application dated 08.09.2021 and reply given by CPIO (IC-SP) of CIC have been perused. The appellant had asked for a copy of response received from CPIO-UGC after the decision dated 16.03.2016 of the CIC with regard to validity of degree certificates issued by Karnataka State Open University, Mysuru. CPIO has denied the information under section 8(1)(e) and 8(1)(j), without mention of any justification for such denial. After going through the information sought, FAA is of the opinion that the issues contained in the decision of the Commission pertains to a larger public interest viz., future of the students to whom KSOU awarded degrees. Accordingly, the CPIO is directed to provide the requisite information to the appellant by 01.12.2021 free of cost. NA
1997 CICOM/A/E/21/00227 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 22-10-2021 Ref: RTI No. CICOM/R/E/21/00936. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: “Unsatisfied with the reply”, the Appellant submitted first appeal dated 22.10.2021 requesting information as mentioned in the RTI application. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition dated 22.10.2021, RTI application dated 04.10.2021 and reply given by CPIO (IC-NG) of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. NA
1998 CICOM/A/P/21/00114 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 21-10-2021 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/21/00376 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1999 CICOM/A/P/21/00115 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 21-10-2021 Ref: RTI No. CICOM/R/P/21/00449. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant has submitted First Appeal in respect of reply to Point-2. He did not find relevant information at the web-link provided by the CPIO. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and CPIO’s reply have been perused. The Appellant may note that penalties are awarded by the Commission on CPIO/FAA through its decisions. All the decisions of the Commission are uploaded on the website of the CIC for information of the public. Once information has been provided in public domain and on the website, the information is no longer held by or under the control of any public authority and hence, is no longer accessible as ‘right to information’. As the Commission provides information about the penalties imposed and penalties recovered in its Annual Reports, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. NA
2000 CICOM/A/P/21/00116 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 21-10-2021 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/21/00404 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (RTI Cell) द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। उल्लेखनीय है कि सूचना अधिकार अधिकारी अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA