There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
2011 CICOM/A/E/21/00216 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-10-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00750. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant has submitted first appeal against the replies given by the CPIO-CIC in respect of point No.1,2,4,8&9 as per details available in the Appeal. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The RTI Application dated 16.08.2021, the reply of CPIO dt.15.09.2021 and first appeal dt.04.10.2021 have been perused. Point–1,2 & 8 : The CPIO is directed to revisit and give suitable reply to the appellant by 13.11.2021 free of cost. Point-4: As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. It is verified from the file that the CPIO had provided correct information. Therefore no intervention is required on behalf of FAA in the matter. Point-9 : The appellant may please note that once information has been provided in public domain and on the website, the information is no longer held by or under the control of any public authority and hence, is no longer accessible as ‘right to information’. As the RTI Act 2005, RTI Rules 2012 and RTI related OMs etc are made available on the CIC website and DOPT website, the reply given by the CPIO-CIC is considered appropriate and as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of FAA in the matter. NA
2012 CICOM/A/P/21/00112 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 01-10-2021 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/21/00338 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
2013 CICOM/A/E/21/00215 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 01-10-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00814 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: Complete false and misleading information provided by CPIO of CIC. No information provided by the CPIO regarding the asked case. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The RTI Application dated 04.09.2021, the reply of CPIO dt. 01.10.2021 and first appeal dt.01.10.2021 have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO had informed the status as per the records of the Commission. The reply of CPIO-CIC is considered appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Besides, all the decisions taken by the CIC are made available on the website of CIC. Therefore no intervention on behalf of FAA is required in this matter. NA
2014 CICOM/A/E/21/00214 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 29-09-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/21/00722 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (Admin) द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
2015 CICOM/A/E/21/00213 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-09-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00877. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: Use Section 6 (3) RTI Act 2005 & H.Delhi High court judgement Girish Mittal Vs Ministry of Railway for my RTI Application query. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The RTI Application dated 18.09.2021, the reply of CPIO dt. 21.09.2021 and first appeal dt.28.09.2021 have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. The reply of CPIO-CIC is considered appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Section 6(3) of RTI Act, 2005 is not applicable in the instant case. Therefore no intervention on behalf of FAA is required in this matter. NA
2016 CICOM/A/P/21/00107 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-09-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/P/21/00381. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant has mentioned that the CPIO has not furnished any information for both queries. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and CPIO’s reply have been perused. The CPIO-CIC has provided information that exists in the records of the Commission. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Hence, the reply sent by the CPIO-CIC is appropriate and as per the provisions of RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. NA
2017 CICOM/A/P/21/00108 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-09-2021 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/21/00408 के बिंदु संख्या 1 के तहत प्रदान की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु, केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी ने आर.टी.आई. आवेदन के बिंदु संख्या 2, 3, एवं 4 के प्रतिउत्तर का उल्लेख नहीं किया है अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को यह निर्देश दिए जाता है कि वह अपीलकर्ता को 10.11.2021 तक आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/21/00408 के बिंदु सं. 2, 3, एवं 4 के तहत मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर अपीलकर्ता को पूर्ण एवं स्पष्ट सूचना प्रेषित की जाये। NA
2018 CICOM/A/P/21/00109 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-09-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/P/21/00352. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: Do not agree with replies of CPIO on both points. Against the provisions of Sec. 6, 4(1)(d) & 4(a). DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and CPIO’s reply have been perused. The CPIO-CIC has answered both points as requested by the Appellant. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Hence, the reply sent by the CPIO-CIC is appropriate and as per the provisions of RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. NA
2019 CICOM/A/P/21/00110 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-09-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/P/21/00390. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant has mentioned that the CPIO has wilfully not furnished information. Not furnished the information within 30 days. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and CPIO’s reply have been perused. The CPIO-CIC has provided information as per the records of the Commission. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Hence, the reply sent by the CPIO-CIC is appropriate and as per the provisions of RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. [Hard copy of the FAA Decision will be received by you through post.] NA
2020 CICOM/A/P/21/00111 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-09-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/P/21/00391. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant has mentioned that the CPIO has wilfully not furnished information. Not furnished the information within 30 days. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and CPIO’s reply have been perused. The CPIO-CIC has provided information as per the records of the Commission. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Hence, the reply sent by the CPIO-CIC is appropriate and as per the provisions of RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. NA