There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
2051 CICOM/A/E/21/00197 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 06-09-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00792 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: CPIO (IC-NG) is directed to provide copy of letter dated 06.08.2018 from Karvy to SEBI, as asked by the appellant free of cost by 30.09.2021. NA
2052 CICOM/A/E/21/00196 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-09-2021 Ref: CICOM/R/T/21/00041 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: After perusal of the RTI Application dated 03.08.2021 and the reply of CPIO dated 02.09.2021, it is observed that in the RTI application, the appellant had described the events that happened on the day of hearing of his second appeal. He had not sought any information which could be made available under section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of FAA in the matter. NA
2053 CICOM/A/E/21/00195 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-09-2021 Ref: CICOM/R/E/21/00607/4 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant in his First Appeal dated 04.09.2021 has mentioned “No Response within the time limit” as the grounds for first appeal. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: After perusal of the RTI Application dated 04.08.2021 and the reply of CPIO dated 07.09.2021, the CPIO (IC-UM) is directed to ensure adherence of time schedule as per provisions of the RTI Act 2005, in providing reply/information to the RTI applicant. NA
2054 CICOM/A/E/21/00193 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 30-08-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/21/00665 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (Admin) द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। प्रथम अपील में उल्लेखित अन्य मदें जो कि RTI आवेदन का हिस्सा नहीं है, तथा उस पर प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी द्वारा कोई कार्यवाही अपेक्षित नहीं है। NA
2055 CICOM/A/E/21/00194 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 30-08-2021 Ref: RTI application No.CICOM/R/ E/21/00730 dated 11.08.2021 and reply dated 27.08.2021. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant in his First Appeal dated 30.08.2021 has mentioned that the CPIO has not provided desired information and documents despite availability of desired information and documents in custody of CIC. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The first appeal petition, RTI Application and the reply of CPIO (CIC-YS) have been perused. The appellant may note that as mentioned in FAQ (made available on the website of CIC - www.cic.gov.in => FAQ), the record retention period in Central Information Commission in respect of second appeals and complaints is six months from the date of disposal of the case. Hence the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of FAA in the matter. NA
2056 CICOM/A/E/21/00191 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-08-2021 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant in his First Appeal dated 27.08.2021 has mentioned that the CPIO has provided misleading information. He requested the information as mentioned in the RTI application. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The first appeal petition, RTI Application and the reply of CPIO have been perused. CPIO (M&R) is directed to provide appropriate information by 28.09.2021 about the basis on which the word “Bench” displayed in different modules of CIC website. NA
2057 CICOM/A/E/21/00190 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 26-08-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/21/00634 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारीयों द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
2058 CICOM/A/E/21/00189 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 25-08-2021 Ref: RTI No. CICOM/R/E/21/00702 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: CPIO (IC-NG) is directed to provide copy of letter dated 10.01.2018 from Gradiente Infotainment Ltd to SEBI, as asked by the appellant free of cost by 30.09.2021. NA
2059 CICOM/A/E/21/00188 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 23-08-2021 Ref: RTI No. CICOM/R/E/21/00656 dated 15.07.2021. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant has requested to provide information on all the points on the grounds that similar information for the period April 2019 to July 2020 was provided in Application no.CICOM/R/E/20/00589. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: Points-1,2,3,6&7: All the decisions on Appeals/Complaints are published in CIC’s website. Once information has been provided in public domain and on the website, the information is no longer held by or under the control of any public authority and hence, is no longer accessible as ‘right to information’. Point-4: CPIO (CR-II) is directed to provide the information, as is available in the records, by 29.09.2021. However, CPIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He/She is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Point-5: Since this information is not compiled by the Commission, no intervention is required on behalf of FAA in this matter. NA
2060 CICOM/A/P/21/00089 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 23-08-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/P/21/00315. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant has mentioned in his first appeal that the CIC orders cannot be destroyed or made untraceable. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO (IC-VN) have been perused. With regard to Point-1, the appellant may please note that as displayed in FAQ on the website of the CIC, the records relating to the second appeals and complaints are retained for a period of six months from the date of disposal of the case. Hence, the reply provided by the CPIO, CIC is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of FAA on this point. As regards point-2, the CPIO (IC-VN) is directed to provide appropriate information or appropriate reply in case information in this regard is not available due to weeding out of records. NA