There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
2001 CICOM/A/E/21/00226 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 21-10-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00907/1. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeals dated 21.10.2021 & 24.10.2021 seeking i) Whether any date for Hearing fixed by CIC with regard to admitted cases; ii) Copies of any record, written statement / counter affidavit submitted by the respondents in the aforesaid matters. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY The First Appeal petition dated 21.10.2021, RTI application dated 25.09.2021 and replies given by CPIO (IC-SC) and CPIO (RTI Cell) of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Accordingly, Points 1 to 4, 6 & 7 are not covered u/s 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005. Point-5 had been answered by CPIO-CIC appropriately informing that intimation for hearing would be sent soon in respect of admitted appeals/complaints. Point-8 had been transferred to the concerned Public Authority as per the provisions of the RTI Act 2005. As regards part (ii) of grounds of first appeal is not a part of RTI application dated 25.09.2021. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. NA
2002 CICOM/A/E/21/00225 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 20-10-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00903. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant has sought reply to point-3 regarding the policy/procedure being followed in the Commission after receipt of a complaint. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The first appeal petition dated 20.10.2021, RTI application dated 24.09.2021 and the replies of CPIOs of CIC have been perused. The CPIO (Admn.)-CIC is directed to provide appropriate reply to Point-3 of the RTI application of the appellant by 22.11.2021 free of cost. NA
2003 CICOM/A/E/21/00222 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 15-10-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00800. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY The Appellant submitted first appeal against the CPIO replies on point No. 1(A) a, b, c, d & e; 1(B) b, d & e; 1(C) b, d & e; 1(D) as per details available in the first appeal. 1(A) In respect of File no. CIC/CBECE/C/2020/685925, the CPIO (IC-NG) is directed- a) To provide Name and designation of CPIO of CBECC, if attended the hearing and his/her details available in the file. (b) To provide copy/copies of authority letter(s) produced by those who attended the hearing, if available in the file. (c) To specify the mode of attendance. Interim order of the Commission indicates that the Complainant and Respondent CPIO Mr. Harish Kumar Bajpai attended the Hearing through video-call. However, the appellant submits that the Respondent and himself were physically attended Hearing in CIC building. (d) To specify whether the requested information is available in the concerned file. (e) To specify whether the requested information is available in the concerned file. 1(B) In respect of File Nos. CIC/CUSCZ/C/2020/682847, CIC/CUSCZ/C/2020/ 679227 and CIC/CUSCZ/C/2020/682873, the CPIO is directed – (b) To specify whether the requested information is available in the concerned file. (d) To specify whether the requested information is available in the concerned file. (e) To specify whether the requested information is available in the concerned file. 1(C) In respect of File Nos. CIC/CCUM3/A/2020/671341, CIC/CCUM3/A/2020/ 693848, CIC/CUSCZ/A/2019/657148, CIC/CUSCZ/A/2020/693656, CIC/CUSCZ/A/ 2020/600848, CIC/CUSCZ/A/2020/682886 and CIC/CUSCZ/A/2020/678002 the CPIO is directed – (b) To specify whether the requested information is available in the concerned file. (d) To specify whether the requested information is available in the concerned file. (e) To specify whether the requested information is available in the concerned file. 1(D) CPIO is directed to give a suitable reply in view of the first appeal submitted by the appellant. CPIO is directed to give point-wise reply to the appellant and comply with the above directions by 22.11.2021 free of cost. NA
2004 CICOM/A/E/21/00223 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 15-10-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00847. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY The Appellant submitted first appeal against the CPIO reply dated 05.10.2021 as per details available in the first appeal. As regards providing of ebooks as mentioned at para-1/point 1(a) to 1(k), the CPIO has submitted his views as under. “The appellant was provided all the ebooks prior to hearing and the submission received from the CPIO, as was indicated in the CIC order in all concerned orders, was provided later on RTI application. Other documents, if any, received and were not part of the CIC were not provided.” Accordingly, CPIO is directed to provide the complete information as sought by the appellant in his RTI application, free of cost, before 26.11.2021. NA
2005 CICOM/A/E/21/00221 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 14-10-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00881/2. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant has submitted first appeal against the replies given by the CPIO-M&R, CIC in respect of point No. 2,3,4&5 as per details available in the Appeal. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The RTI Application dated 18.09.2021, the reply of CPIO dt.04.10.2021 & 11.10.2021 and first appeal dt.14.10.2021 have been perused. Point–4 & 5: The CPIO has offered inspection of records with prior appointment. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of FAA in this regard at this stage. Point-2 and 3(A): CPIO (M&R), CIC is directed to give a suitable reply/ information to the appellant by 18.11.2021 free of cost. Point – 3(B) & 3(C): CPIO (CIC-YS), CPIO (IC-NG), CPIO (IC-VN), CPIO (IC-SC), CPIO (IC-AP), CPIO (IC-HS), CPIO (IC-SP) & CPIO (IC-UM) of the Commission are directed to provide the required information, if at all such lists are separately maintained, to the Appellant by 18.11.2021 free of cost. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. NA
2006 CICOM/A/P/21/00113 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-10-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/P/21/00370. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL The CPIO has given vague and evasive reply under the RTI Act, which is unjustified. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO-CIC have been perused. The CPIO (IC-VN) is directed to revisit and provide point-wise reply/information to the applicant by 13.11.2021 free of cost. NA
2007 CICOM/A/E/21/00220 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 06-10-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00802. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: “Details not provided.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The RTI Application dated 31.08.2021, the replies of CPIOs of CIC dt. 24.09.2021 & 11.10.2021 and first appeal dt.06.10.2021 have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. In the instant case, the replies sent by CPIOs of CIC are considered appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore no intervention on behalf of FAA is required in this matter. NA
2008 CICOM/A/E/21/00217 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-10-2021 Ref: RTI No.CICOM/R/E/21/00859. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: “My address is L22 A Lajpat Nagar, Sahibabad and you are sending L20 Lajpat Nagar. Please send me answer on correct address.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The RTI Application dated 14.09.2021, the replies of CPIOs dt. 16.09.2021 & 14.10.2021 and first appeal dt.05.10.2021 have been perused. The CPIO, Dak Section, CIC is directed to send his reply to correct address i.e. Shri Ajay Kapoor, L-22A Lajpat Nagar, Sahibabad – 201005, Uttar Pradesh by 03.11.2021 free of cost. NA
2009 CICOM/A/E/21/00218 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-10-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/21/00888/1 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारियों द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
2010 CICOM/A/E/21/00219 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-10-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/21/00888/1 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारियों द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA