There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
291 CICOM/A/E/24/00388 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 16-12-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01525 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Requested information is closely connected with Central Information Commission Jurisdiction. As vigilance disciplinary matter under complaint handling policy of complaint number 66935/2024 forwarded to CIC." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
292 CICOM/A/E/24/00389 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 16-12-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01621 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO provided incomplete, misleading or false information. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The grounds of appeal mentioned by the appellant in the First Appeal are beyond the mandate of the First Appellate Authority, CIC. The CPIO has already transferred the RTI application to the concerned public authority, the appellant may approach the same for First Appeal. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
293 CICOM/A/E/24/00387 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 13-12-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01620 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO provided incomplete, misleading or false information. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO has already transferred the RTI application to the concerned public authority. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
294 CICOM/A/P/24/00145 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 13-12-2024 Please see the file. download pdf
295 CICOM/A/E/24/00384 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 12-12-2024 On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. NA
296 CICOM/A/E/24/00386 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 12-12-2024 On perusal of the Online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO for the RTI application No CICOM/R/E/24/01623 is not as per the provision or RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, direction is being given to CPIO, (DR to IC AR) to revisit the matter and provide complete appropriate information within 10 days of receipt of this order. NA
297 CICOM/A/E/24/00385 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-12-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01532 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO provided incomplete, misleading or false information. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
298 CICOM/A/P/24/00137 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-12-2024 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन CICOM/R/P/24/00442 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। आपके द्वारा मांगी गई आर.टी.आई में जानकारी केंद्रीय सूचना आयोग से संबंधित नहीं है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
299 CICOM/A/P/24/00139 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 11-12-2024 Please see the file. download pdf
300 CICOM/A/P/24/00143 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 11-12-2024 Please see the file. download pdf