| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 321 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00368 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
25-11-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 322 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00132 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
22-11-2024 |
Please see the file. |
 |
| 323 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00133 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
22-11-2024 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 324 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00367 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
21-11-2024 |
On perusal of the Online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO for the RTI application No CICOM/R/E/24/01481 is not as per the provision or RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, direction is being given to CPIO, (Dak Section) to revisit the matter, obtained the latest position and inform the appellant within 10 days of receipt of this order. |
NA |
| 325 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00364 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
20-11-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 326 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00366 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
20-11-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 327 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00365 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
20-11-2024 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01474
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that the CPIO refused access to information requested.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 328 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00363 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
19-11-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 329 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00362 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
19-11-2024 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01442
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"To,Central Information Commission,Department of Personnel and Training.Subject : Complaint and request under right to information Act 2005.Dear Sir,Kindly refer the attachment and email drop on 16072024 at 05:18 pm regarding address update.You are therefore requested to provide all decision of CIC in hardcopy mention in attached file."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
The information once published in public domain may not be treated as information held by a particular public authority.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 330 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00360 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
18-11-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |