| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 341 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00352 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
06-11-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 342 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00353 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
06-11-2024 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01318/1
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO refused access to information requested.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
The reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 343 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00126 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
06-11-2024 |
Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/P/24/00401
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that:
1) Kindly see enclosed letter dated 21/10/24.
2) Receipt for Rs. 10/- has not been given to me. All are issuing receipt.
3) Information has not been given on all points. Information for Point No. 5 & 6 not provided. The purpose of RTI Act is defeated by not giving information. It does not cost anything if given.
4) Kindly pass speaking order in appeal.
5) Personal hearing may kind be allowed to appellant.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
In the instant appeal, the appellant had requested for personal hearing of the first appeal via video conferencing mode to which a hearing was scheduled on 04.12.2024 at 11:00 am via Bharat VC conference. Both the appellant and the CPIO were present in the hearing via VC mode. All the submissions made by the appellant were considered during the decision on the first appeal. The appellant was shown the relevant information which was sought on the CIC portal during the VC hearing.
For Point 5 & 6
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
The information once published in public domain may not be treated as information held by a particular public authority.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 344 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00127 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
06-11-2024 |
Please see the file. |
 |
| 345 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00128 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
06-11-2024 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 346 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00350 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
05-11-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 347 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00351 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
05-11-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 348 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00349 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
04-11-2024 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01434
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO provided incomplete, misleading or false information.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create, collate or interpret information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 349 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00123 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
01-11-2024 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 350 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00124 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
01-11-2024 |
Please see the file. |
|