There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
381 CICOM/A/E/24/00328 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 15-10-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01331 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal being dissatisfied with the reply of CPIO. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
382 CICOM/A/E/24/00327 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 14-10-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01355 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "The desired information ie point number 1 and 2 of the RTI request is not available in the document referred to (annual reports) at the URL provided by the CPIO in his reply. Please provide annual and quarterly RTI returns submitted by National Scheduled Tribes Finance and Development Corporation to Central Information Commission for last four years." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the Annual Report, performance of only such PAs is analyzed which have submitted quarterly returns for all the four quarters and the list of PAs who have not submitted their quarterly returns in accordance with Section 25(3) of the RTI Act is available in the Annexure of the Annual Report. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
383 CICOM/A/E/24/00326 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-10-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01327 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Sir, I got the information of para 1 given but the reply of para 2 was ignored. If a government agency fails to reply with in 30 days and with no information which was asked then is there a provision of putting that agency with a fine of Rs. 2000 par day for delay reply. If no such panelty is there then what is the role of the CIC in that case." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. For more details, RTI Act, 2005 may please be referred. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
384 CICOM/A/E/24/00324 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 11-10-2024 On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. NA
385 CICOM/A/E/24/00325 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-10-2024 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/24/01250 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/24/01250 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। तद्नुसार अपील निस्‍तारित की जाती है । NA
386 CICOM/A/E/24/00322 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 11-10-2024 On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. NA
387 CICOM/A/E/24/00321 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-10-2024 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/24/01194 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/24/01194 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। तद्नुसार अपील निस्‍तारित की जाती है । NA
388 CICOM/A/P/24/00113 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-10-2024 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/24/00365 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating “The applicant in specific solicited information in the form of certified copies (Sec. 7 of (9) the laid down norms or orders or remedies and the superior authority over Controlling authority as a public authority is making fraudulent misrepresentations through falsification and fabrication of records and repeatedly practicing fraud and none of such complaints against fraud played on CIC by such CPIOs are taken on record and simply lodged by Registry. The normal course after receiving the complaint is either to provide a number or return/reject the complaint and send the same back to complainant and you will appreciate the fact that the complaint should atleast be aware of the status of such compliant filed by him without expecting a result after 2 or 3 years. Reply not relevant, not complete, not correct, hence this first appeal. PRAYER: Appellant pray for speaking orders and directions of CPIO for providing relevant, correct and complete information on such certified copies of laid down procedures on lodging of complaints by Registry without informing to complainants.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
389 CICOM/A/E/24/00320 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-10-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01328 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "My requested information has been denied on the grounds that it is a matter of state govt. and the Central Information Commission cannot do anything about it and I have to file a RTI with the state govt only. My application was related to the glitchy Bihar Information Commission website in which I cannot file an RTI application because when I click on submit, it shows a black screen with error. I appeal to you with following questions: 1) If my state govt. refuses my fundamental right to information by having a faulty website where one cannot file the RTI at the very first place, who am I, as a mere citizen of India will go and hold whom responsible? 2) Under Article 256 of the Indian Constitution, it is the obligation of every state to comply with the acts of Parliament and it is the duty of the Union to give directions to the State for that purpose; then why does CIC is saying that they cannot do anything about it? Isnt it the constitutional duty of CIC to make sure that RTI, which is a act of Parliament, is complied by all the States? 3) The reply from your side states "Your matter is related to State Govt. so file a RTI in State govt. website". Explain it to me that how am I supposed to do that when at the very first place my complaint is regarding that the state govt. RTI website is not working? How am I suppose to file a RTI in the state govt. when the website is not working?" DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. The working of State Information Commissions does not come under the domain of Central Information Commission. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
390 CICOM/A/E/24/00319 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 09-10-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01321 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal being unsatisfied with the reply of the CPIO. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. As per the Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, the applicant shall file information request with the concerned Public Authority which holds the information. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA