| SNo. | Registration No | Appellate Authority Name | Received date | Reply Appeal | Reply Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 411 | CICOM/A/E/24/00301 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 24-09-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |
| 412 | CICOM/A/P/24/00108 | Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR | 23-09-2024 | Ref. RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/24/00320 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Took Rs. 10,000/- Bribe from my driver at Puri. So asked in RTI clause the reason but the corrupt RTO remains silent till today. Corrupt RTO tells RTI Act as a farse. So please take necessary action as per RTI rules.†DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the grounds of appeal mentioned by the appellant in the First Appeal are beyond the purview/ambit of First Appellate Authority, CIC. The Indian Postal Order for the amount of Rs. 10 – IPO No. 64F 411290 is being returned back to the appellant. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. | NA |
| 413 | CICOM/A/E/24/00300 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 23-09-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |
| 414 | CICOM/A/E/24/00299 | Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR | 21-09-2024 | Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01238 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating he is not satisfied with the reply of the CPIO. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. As per the Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, the applicant shall file information request with the concerned Public Authority which holds the information. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. | NA |
| 415 | CICOM/A/E/24/00298 | Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR | 21-09-2024 | Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01070 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that " 1. PIO SIR NOT FURNISH DECESION COPY AS PER MY MY RTI REQUEST. I REQUEST YOU TO FURNISH DECESION COPY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE" DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. | NA |
| 416 | CICOM/A/E/24/00293 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 20-09-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |
| 417 | CICOM/A/E/24/00296 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 20-09-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |
| 418 | CICOM/A/E/24/00294 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 20-09-2024 | The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. | NA |
| 419 | CICOM/A/E/24/00295 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 20-09-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |
| 420 | CICOM/A/E/24/00297 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 20-09-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |