| SNo. | Registration No | Appellate Authority Name | Received date | Reply Appeal | Reply Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 391 | CICOM/A/E/24/00317 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 08-10-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |
| 392 | CICOM/A/E/24/00318 | Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR | 08-10-2024 | Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01386 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to formally complain about the continued denial of information that I have requested. Despite submitting a written request to the concerned department, I have yet to receive the information sought. I kindly request you to take necessary action to compel the department to provide the requested information. A copy of my previous request is attached for your reference." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. It appears that the information sought pertains to State Government which does not come under the domain of the Central Information Commission. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. | NA |
| 393 | CICOM/A/E/24/00316 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 07-10-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |
| 394 | CICOM/A/E/24/00314 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 06-10-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |
| 395 | CICOM/A/E/24/00315 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 06-10-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |
| 396 | CICOM/A/E/24/00312 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 04-10-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |
| 397 | CICOM/A/E/24/00313 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 04-10-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |
| 398 | CICOM/A/E/24/00311 | Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI | 03-10-2024 | On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. | NA |
| 399 | CICOM/A/E/24/00310 | Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR | 02-10-2024 | Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01285 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "This information is not sufficient and state government not given the any information about this RTI in time period as per RTI act 2005. So i requested to you take the information about my RTI from state government because Madhya Pradesh RTI department not follow the rules of RTI act 2005. If following the rules RTI department given the information timely. So i again requested to you please provide the information from state government." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Further, the State Information Commissions do not come under the domain of Central Information Commission. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. | NA |
| 400 | CICOM/A/E/24/00309 | Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR | 01-10-2024 | Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01101 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO provided incomplete,misleading or false information. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. | NA |