| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 361 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00342 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
27-10-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 362 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00341 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
25-10-2024 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01379
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO provided incomplete,misleading or false information.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
As per the Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, the applicant shall file information request with the concerned Public Authority which holds the information.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 363 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00340 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
25-10-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 364 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00339 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
24-10-2024 |
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO is CIC have been perused.
As per section 8(1) (j) information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity of interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual may be exempted from disclosure unless the Central Public Information Officer of the State Public Information Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 365 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00119 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
24-10-2024 |
Please see the file. |
 |
| 366 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00337 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
23-10-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 367 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00338 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
23-10-2024 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01357/2
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"HONOURABLE CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER SIR, THE CONCERNED OFFICIALS ARE PROVIDING FALSE INFORMATION AND THEY ARE PLAYING WITH MY LIFE. THEREFORE, HONOURABLE CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER SIR, PLEASE PROVIDE ME THE ANSWERS OF THE FIFTEEN (15) QUESTIONS MENTIONED IN THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENT."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO(M&R) is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 368 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00336 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
23-10-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 369 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00333 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
22-10-2024 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01012
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
" Without prejudice TO FAA The contents of reply given by the CPIO is not satisfactory as in the contents of required information it is duly mentioned that being the senior citizen of our nation in the age of 63 years passing through mental depression even various diseases even no money to engaged an advocate including due to the less educated person prayer made for provide required information as your above mentioned commission is made by our government to help & protect the rights of citizen of India. Please note. You are requested to get through the contents of required information which is very much available to this reputed central information commission even being a applicant I have every right to entitled the details of my required information coming in preview of your above mentioned commission. By these above mentioned facts you are requested to provide required information as per RTI act 2005 & being the FAA of above reputed commission."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create, collate or interpret information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 370 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00334 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
22-10-2024 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01103
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"Without prejudice TO FAA The contents of reply given by the CPIO is not satisfactory as in the contents of required information it is duly mentioned that being the senior citizen of our nation in the age of 63 years passing through mental depression even various diseases even no money to engaged an advocate including due to the less educated person prayer made for provide required information as your above mentioned commission is made by our government to help & protect the rights of citizen of India. Please note. You are requested to get through the contents of required information which is very much available to this reputed central information commission even being a applicant I have every right to entitled the details of my required information coming in preview of your above mentioned commission. By these above mentioned facts you are requested to point wise reply & provide required information as per RTI act 2005 & being the FAA of above reputed commission. With hope that you will consider my prayer & help to get the facts of my required information."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create, collate or interpret information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |