There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
421 CICOM/A/E/24/00292 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 19-09-2024 On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. NA
422 CICOM/A/E/24/00291 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 19-09-2024 On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. NA
423 CICOM/A/E/24/00290 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 18-09-2024 On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. NA
424 CICOM/A/P/24/00107 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 17-09-2024 Ref. Dy No.- 75110/25.06.2024/RTI-Cell/Misc DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO(RTI Cell) is directed to revisit the RTI application and provide information to the appellant as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, by 30.09.2024. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
425 CICOM/A/E/24/00289 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 17-09-2024 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/24/01257 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
426 CICOM/A/E/24/00288 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 15-09-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/T/24/00066 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "In Continuation to my RTI (MOURB/R/E/24/01559 dated 14/08/2024) The central information commission (CIC) is requested to order for arranging to the applicant the hard copy which is Fair , Legible, Dark print out (True copy) of order /judgement w.r.t. Disclosure of details of annual property of return (APR) of assets incompliance with transparency, of government servant assets (clearing the doubt of his possessing assets disproportionate to his known source of income, ready to bear the cost of true copies as per RTI cost rules etc." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
427 CICOM/A/E/24/00286 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 13-09-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01221 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "That the concerned CPIO has violated section 7 of RTI act 2005 by denying me information on two points mentioned in my rti application. That infact public authority of CIC is itself violating section 4 of RTI act 2005 by denying me the information which is already available in their public records. That Central Information Commissioner like ANANDI RAMALINGAM is making this rti act 2005 dead letters in this nation. That CPIO has denied me information on both these two points because she herself has conspired with corrupt officials of CIC who are making rti act dead letters in this nation . That these corrupt information commissioner are issuing show cause notices to guilty CPIO in very few cases . Only Shri VK Tiwari has issued 11 show cause notice yet in public authority of CIC. That it is very shocking affair for we all Indians that corrupt information commissioner are helping guilty CPIO and FAA to abscond from the ambit of section 20 of RTI act 2005 . That third type of offence is very grave one which has been committed by the information commissioner with me also . That Information Commissioner Anandi Ramalingam has absconded the guilty CPIO of DOHED in one of my second appeal and complaint which was listed for hearing on 27th August 2024. That the mail was written to secretary DOHED and rti application was also filed by me in public authority of DOHED.That thhe nodal CPIO of rti cell of DOHED has wrongly transferred it to public authority of DOSEL so when first information SEEKED by me was whether mail has been received by the secretary of education or not .That the nodal cpio of RTI cell of DOSEL has wrongly transferred it to CPIO of IS3 section so when he was duty bound to transfer my rti application to Public authority of DOHED again . That information commissioner has absconded all these guilty CPIO to disappear violation of RTE act 2009 by ministry of education of goi. That rti act 2005 is being made dead letters by CIC itself to kill all existing acts in this nation. That it is duty of public authority of CIC to segregate all such defective and malafide judgement passed by all erring information commissioner so that citizens of this nation can view easily that how these so call eminent but corrupt and moral less information commissioner are killing this rti act and ultimately killing democracy in this section. That it has been mandated in section 4 of RTI act that administrative or quasi judicial officer will provide reasons of making their decision and CPIO has denied me information at point number 2 of my rti application which was related with her illegal decision as a QUASHI JUDICIAL body . Hence this first appeal under section 19 .kindly provide me these two points information immediately. Kindly take stern disciplinary action against erring CPIO ." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
428 CICOM/A/E/24/00287 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 13-09-2024 On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. NA
429 CICOM/A/P/24/00106 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 12-09-2024 Please see the file. download pdf
430 CICOM/A/E/24/00284 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 10-09-2024 On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. NA