There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
2121 CICOM/A/E/21/00142 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 16-07-2021 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. As per Record Retention Schedule of the Central Information Commission (Office Memorandum No. 26/1/2011-CIC/Admn Dated 22th February, 2011), the quasi judicial records of the Commission shall be retained for a period of six months from the date of the final disposal of the case. In view of the above, the reply of CPIO-CIC is considered appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act 2005. Therefore, no intervention is necessary on behalf of FAA in this matter. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2122 CICOM/A/E/21/00144 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 16-07-2021 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY The First Appeal petitions, RTI applications and replies given by the CPIOs have been seen. It is observed that the replies given by the CPIOs are appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. It is verified that the information available on the CIC website can be copies into a word / excel document. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2123 CICOM/A/E/21/00143 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 16-07-2021 In his First Appeal dated 16.07.2021, the Appellant inter alia has requested the FAA to direct CPIO to furnish point-wise reply, with all the annexures and certified true copies of all the documents asked for in Points 4&5. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application, reply given by the CPIO and the email correspondence have been perused. It is noticed that the CPIO-CIC has provided information against RTI request dated 02.06.2021 in respect of points 1,2&3. The CPIO is hereby directed to furnish point-wise reply/information to the appellant in respect of points No.4&5 of RTI request dated 02.06.2021 as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 within next 10 working days i.e. not later than 31.08.2021. FAA has acceded to the relief sought in the first appeal and directed the CPIO-CIC accordingly. Hence, FAA felt that personal hearing, as sought for by the appellant, is not necessitated. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2124 CICOM/A/E/21/00145 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 16-07-2021 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY The First Appeal petitions, RTI applications and replies given by the CPIOs have been seen. It is observed that the replies given by the CPIOs are appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. It is verified that the information available on the CIC website can be copies into a word / excel document. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2125 CICOM/A/E/21/00141 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 15-07-2021 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. It is observed that the CPIO had provided information as available in the records of the Commission. The appellant may note that as per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Hence, the reply sent by the CPIO, CIC is appropriate and as per the provisions of RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2126 CICOM/A/E/21/00140 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 15-07-2021 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. The reply given by the CPIO-CIC is considered appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2127 CICOM/A/E/21/00139 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 13-07-2021 संबंधित संचिका (प्रथम अपील आवेदन एवं आर.टी.आई. आवेदन) का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि आर. टी.आई. आवेदन संख्या CICOM/R/E/21/00550 के बिंदु संख्या 1 एवं 2 के तहत प्रदान की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु, आर.टी.आई. आवेदन के बिंदु संख्या 3 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (admin) द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना सही नहीं है, इसलिए इस सम्बन्ध में अपीलकर्ता की दलील को उचित मानते हुए केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (admin) को निर्देश दिया जाता है कि इस आदेश के प्राप्ति के पंद्रह दिन के भीतर आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/21/00550 के बिंदु सं. 3 के तहत मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर अपीलकर्ता को पुनः स्पष्ट सूचना प्रेषित की जाये। चूँकि, यह मामला व्यापक जनहित से सम्बंधित नहीं है, इसे suo – motu disclosure के तहत सार्वजनिक प्रकाशित नहीं किया जाए। NA
2128 CICOM/A/P/21/00067 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 12-07-2021 Please see the file. download pdf
2129 CICOM/A/P/21/00070 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 12-07-2021 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. The point-wise replies furnished by CPIO are appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Therefore, no intervention by FAA is necessary in the matter. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2130 CICOM/A/P/21/00068 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-07-2021 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY : The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. The appellant may note that once information has been provided in public domain and on the website, the information is no longer held by or under the control of any public authority and hence, is no longer accessible as ‘right to information’. Since all the cases/appeals/complaints disposed of by the Commission are uploaded on the website of the Central Information Commission, no intervention by FAA is necessary in the matter. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA