There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
2151 CICOM/A/E/21/00126 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-06-2021 I. The applicant vide RTI applications No. CICOM/R/E/21/512 dated 08.06.2021 had sought action taken and present status of his email dated 07.06.2021 addressed to secy-cic@nic.in. II. Shri Ram Kumar, CPIO (RTI Cell) had furnished the reply received from the office of Secretary, CIC wherein it was mentioned that no information was available with regard to the 5 points stated in the above RTI application. III. In his First Appeal dated 28.06.2021, the Appellant, inter alia, requested to revisit and review his RTI application and provide information. IV. The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. The reply given by the office of Secretary, CIC is appropriate and as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. V. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2152 CICOM/A/E/21/00125 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-06-2021 I. The applicant vide RTI application No. CICOM/R/E/21/00452 dated 17.05.2021 had sought information as under: “1. Audio recording of the proceedings (case No.CIC/CICOM/C/2019/ 133037 held on 11.05.2021. 2. Copy of the DAK received at CIC which has diarised on 13.05.2021 with diary no.617982, 617883 & 617884 as I have been informed via email from no-reply@nic.in .” II. Shri A.K.Assija, CPIO, CIC had given reply online on 11.06.2021 in respect of point-1 stating that no audio recording of the proceedings in respect of the hearing of the cases are maintained at Central Information Commission, therefore, the same cannot be provided. Shri R.Sitarama Murthy, CPIO, CIC had given reply online on 30.06.2021 in respect of point-2 mentioning that an automated system sends emails whenever link papers are uploaded in the relevant case(s). The CPIO also offered for inspection by the relevant files, if applicant so wishes. III. In his First Appeals dated 28.06.2021, the Appellant, inter alia, mentioned “refused access to information requested” and reiterated to provide requested information. IV. The First Appeal petitions, RTI application and replies given by the CPIOs have been seen. As regards Point-1, the reply of the CPIO is correct. As far as Point-2 is concerned, the CPIO informed the reason for getting email intimation by the applicant and also offered inspection of the relevant files. Therefore, no intervention is required in this matter. V. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2153 CICOM/A/E/21/00122 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 26-06-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर. टी. आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/21/00552 के बिंदु संख्या 1 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (Admn) द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार ही है, इसलिय इस मामले में प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
2154 CICOM/A/E/21/00121 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 25-06-2021 CICOM/A/E/21/00121 & CICOM/A/E/21/00128 I. The applicant vide RTI application No. CICOM/R/E/21/00472 dated 26.05.2021 and No.CICOM/R/T/00028 (transferred from DOPT) dated 29.05.2021 had made same request which is reproduced below: “Kindly Provide Me the Details Under RTI Act 2005 As per section 6(3) of the RTI Act 2005 Outcome and action by NTPC and or O/o CIC on my attached letter mainly to following. A) Serious offense of disclosure of my name by NTPC CPIO concerned and PRAYER Compensation to me through penalty to NTPC NTECL KBUNL as per Sec. 20(1) of the RTI Act. B) Inordinate delay and incorrect information by CPIO. C) Inordinate delay to respond and ignorance by Appellate Authority NTPC. In case the requested information is held by another public authority I request the PIO to transfer the application or part of it within FIVE days and immediately inform me about such transfer as per section 7(8)(iii) and 7(3)(ii) of the RTI Act 2005. I request the PIO to Inform me of the particulars of First Appellate Authority.” II. Shri Rakesh Kumar Rao, CPIO (IC-UM), CIC had received both the above RTI requests on 29.05.2021 and 31.05.2021 and given online reply individually on 29.06.2021 mentioning “No email or letter has been received in this registry.” III. In his First Appeals dated 25.06.2021 & 30.06.2021, the Appellant, inter alia, mentioned as under: “...my RTI application is not seen properly. I am submitting this 1ST APPEAL as I am surprised to note the reply “No email or letter has been received in this registry.” I request O/o CIC to please arrange to email me information sought and hard copy later and permanent solution to subject matter which is repeated many a times.” IV. The First Appeal petitions, RTI applications and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. The CPIO is directed to revisit his reply and provide appropriate information to the appellant within 10 days from the date of this decision. The CPIO may seek information u/s 5(4) of RTI Act, 2005, if necessary. V. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2155 CICOM/A/E/21/00118 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 24-06-2021 I. The applicant vide RTI applications No. CICOM/R/E/21/00510 & CICOM/R/E/21/00509 dated 07.06.2021 had mentioned that he did not get response from the Bihar Government to his RTI question within the prescribed time limit. The applicant submitted two RTI applications to the Commission requesting clarification about compensation. II. Shri Ram Kumar, CPIO, CIC had replied online on 24.06.2021 for both the RTI applications as under: “Your matter is related to Bihar State Government, which is not covered under Jurisdiction of Central Information Commission. Kindly approach Bihar State Information Commission. Central Information Commission is the Second Appellate Authority against Public Authorities working under Government of India or Union Territories. There is no facility available to forward online RTI application to State Government departments from CIC.” III. In his First Appeals dated 24.06.2021, the Appellant has requested to transfer his RTI applications to Bihar State Information Commission or State Government/authorities. IV. The First Appeal petitions, RTI applications and replies given by the CPIO have been seen. The replies given by the CPIO are appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act 2005. Therefore, no intervention is necessary on behalf of FAA in the matter. V. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2156 CICOM/A/E/21/00119 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 24-06-2021 I. The applicant vide RTI applications No. CICOM/R/E/21/00510 & CICOM/R/E/21/00509 dated 07.06.2021 had mentioned that he did not get response from the Bihar Government to his RTI question within the prescribed time limit. The applicant submitted two RTI applications to the Commission requesting clarification about compensation. II. Shri Ram Kumar, CPIO, CIC had replied online on 24.06.2021 for both the RTI applications as under: “Your matter is related to Bihar State Government, which is not covered under Jurisdiction of Central Information Commission. Kindly approach Bihar State Information Commission. Central Information Commission is the Second Appellate Authority against Public Authorities working under Government of India or Union Territories. There is no facility available to forward online RTI application to State Government departments from CIC.” III. In his First Appeals dated 24.06.2021, the Appellant has requested to transfer his RTI applications to Bihar State Information Commission or State Government/authorities. IV. The First Appeal petitions, RTI applications and replies given by the CPIO have been seen. The replies given by the CPIO are appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act 2005. Therefore, no intervention is necessary on behalf of FAA in the matter. V. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2157 CICOM/A/E/21/00117 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 22-06-2021 I. The applicant vide RTI applications No. CICOM/R/E/21/00490 dated 01.06.2021 had sought action taken and present status of his email dated 31.05.2021 addressed to fdesk-cic@gov.in. II. Shri R.P.Singh, CPIO (Dak Section) vide letter dated 14.06.2021 had provided web-link of email policy of the Central Information Commission (CIC) and advised the applicant to submit second appeal as per the RTI Rules 2012. III. In his First Appeal dated 22.06.2021, the Appellant, inter alia, mentioned that despite order issued by CIC, the concerned CPIO and FAA refused to provide information without justification. . IV. The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. Reply given by the CPIO, CIC is appropriate and as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. V. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2158 CICOM/A/P/21/00055 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 21-06-2021 Please see the file. download pdf
2159 CICOM/A/P/21/00054 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 21-06-2021 Please see the file. download pdf
2160 CICOM/A/P/21/00056 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 21-06-2021 please see the file. download pdf