There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
2131 CICOM/A/E/21/00138 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-07-2021 II. In his First Appeal dated 12.07.2021, the Appellant, inter alia, has mentioned that the CPIO has denied information in respect of points 1-5. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY III. The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. In respect of points - a to d, the CPIO had replied appropriately and as per the provisions of the RTI Act 2005. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. It is also observed that information sought by applicant as mentioned at (II) above is not provided by the CPIO. The same may be provided as per provisions of RTI Act 2005 by 26.08.2021 free of cost. IV. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2132 CICOM/A/P/21/00071 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-07-2021 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. As per Clause 2(n) of RTI Act, 2005 “third party” means a person other than the citizen making a request for information and includes a public authority. In this case, the information sought for relates to a person other than the appellant and the third party did not agree to share it with anyone. Therefore reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence no intervention by First Appellate Authority is necessary in the matter. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2133 CICOM/A/P/21/00069 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-07-2021 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY : The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. The point-wise replies furnished by CPIO are appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Therefore, no intervention by FAA is necessary in the matter. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2134 CICOM/A/E/21/00136 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-07-2021 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. The appellant may note that since no instructions were given by the erstwhile AS & FAA regarding the said email submitted by the appellant, no information was provided to him in this regard. Further, decision of the Commission dated 07.10.2020 can neither be reviewed nor passed any order by the FAA-CIC against it. If the appellant has not satisfied with the decision dated 12.04.2021 of FAA-CIC, he needs to file 2nd Appeal before the Commission in the prescribed format. In view of the above points, the reply given by the CPIO-CIC in respect of RTI request No. CICOM/R/E/21/00611 dated 04.07.2021 is considered appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2135 CICOM/A/E/21/00133 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 10-07-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/21/00582/1 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (M&R section) द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
2136 CICOM/A/E/21/00134 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-07-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/X/21/00004/1 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (M&R section) द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
2137 CICOM/A/E/21/00132 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 07-07-2021 The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO have been seen. The CPIO had replied that only copy of covering letter No.12/6/19/CIC dated 25/10/2019 had been received by the Central Information Commission, as intimation. The appellant may note that as per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Hence, the reply sent by the CPIO, CIC is appropriate and as per the provisions of RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. In view of the submission made by the appellant, CPIO-CIC may write to Dy.CLO & CPIO-SER to provide an attested copy of the affidavit to the appellant immediately with a copy to CIC. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2138 CICOM/A/P/21/00065 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 05-07-2021 Please see the file. download pdf
2139 CICOM/A/P/21/00066 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 05-07-2021 Please see the file. download pdf
2140 CICOM/A/P/21/00063 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 05-07-2021 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/21/00250 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (DR to CIC) द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार ही है, इसलिय इस मामले में प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA