There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
2201 CICOM/A/E/21/00078 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-05-2021 Decision of FAA The First Appeal petition, RTI Application and the replies sent by the CPIOs have been seen. Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 states, “information” means any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force.” In the subject matter, FAA is of the opinion that the information/replies provided by the CPIOs are appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2202 CICOM/A/E/21/00075 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-05-2021 I. The applicant vide RTI application No. CICOM/R/E/21/00401 had sought information relating to CIC Annual Report 2020-2021, details of cases – registered/disposed/pending – action taken by CIC for recovery of penalties and action taken in respect of PAs who did not submit quarterly reports and action taken by the CIC towards PAs who did not submit transparency Audit reports for the periods 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21. II. The following CPIOs have given replies/information. 1) Shri Devender Kumar, CPIO – M&R Section vide letter dated 10.05.2021. 2) Shri Ram Kumar, CPIO: CR-II Section vide letter dated 18.05.2021. 3) Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, CPIO (SO-Legal Section) on 02.06.2021. III. In his First Appeals dated 10.05.2021 & 18.05.2021, the Appellant has mentioned that insufficient information provided in respect of points 1-4 and reply to point-3 is confusing. IV. The First Appeal petitions, RTI application and replies given by the CPIOs have been seen. The replies/information provided by the CPIOs in respect of points 1,2,4 & 5 are appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Point-3: As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. However, the CPIO (SO-M&R) is hereby directed to revisit the reply and provide suitable information, within 10 days from the date of issue of this decision. V. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2203 CICOM/A/E/21/00076 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-05-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर. टी. आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/21/00363 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (केंद्रीय रजिस्ट्री - 1) द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार ही है, इसलिय इस मामले में प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। प्रथम अपील में उल्लेखित अन्य मदें जो कि RTI आवेदन का हिस्सा नहीं है, तथा उस पर प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी द्वारा कोई कार्यवाही अपेक्षित नहीं है। NA
2204 CICOM/A/E/21/00077 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-05-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/T/21/00023 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (केंद्रीय रजिस्ट्री - 1) द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार ही है, इसलिय इस मामले में प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। प्रथम अपील में उल्लेखित अन्य मदें जो कि RTI आवेदन का हिस्सा नहीं है, तथा उस पर प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी द्वारा कोई कार्यवाही अपेक्षित नहीं है। NA
2205 CICOM/A/E/21/00074 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-05-2021 First Appeal Nos. CICOM/A/E/21/00073, CICOM/A/E/21/00074, CICOM/A/E/21/00099, CICOM/A/E/21/00100, CICOM/A/E/21/00101 & CICOM/A/E/21/00102. I. The applicant has requested information vide RTI application No. CICOM/R/E/21/00348 received by the CPIOs of the Commission on 12.04.2021 inter alia with regard to audio video records of hearings in the Commission, details of Shri Neeraj Kumar Gupta, IC & his staff and information relating to disposal of Second Appeals & complaints by him. II. The following CPIOs of the CIC have provided point-wise replies/ information to the RTI applicant. 1)Shri SC Sharma of IC(NG) vide reply dated 26.04.2021, 2)Shri VP Singh, SO(Admn.) vide reply dated 06.05.2021, and 3)Shri SK Rabbani, DS(P&B) vide reply dated 05.05.2021 & 12.05.2021. III. In his First Appeals dated 05.05.2021 & 31.05.2021, the Appellant has mentioned that the concerned CPIO(s) had refused/denied to provide information on points 3, 5 & 6, and provided incomplete information on points 4 & 10. Complete details available in the online first appeals. IV. The First Appeal petitions, RTI application and replies given by the CPIOs have been seen. Point-3: As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. However, the CPIO (DS-P&B) is directed to revisit and give reply to the appellant in compliance with Sec.4(b)(xi) of RTI Act, 2005. Point-4: The CPIO (SO-Admn) is directed to revisit and provide information in the form as available in the records. Point-5: The CPIO (SO-Admn) is directed to revisit and provide information in compliance with Section 4(b)(x) of RTI Act 2005 with due application of Section 8(j). Point-6: The CPIO (SO-Admn) is directed to revisit and provide details of salary in compliance with section 4(b)(x) of RTI Act 2005 with due application of Section 8(j). Point-10: The CPIO (SO-Admn) is directed to revisit the reply in the light of DOPT OM No.11/2/2013-IR(Pt) dated 14.08.2013 and provide appropriate reply. The respective CPIO is directed to provide appropriate reply to the appellant within 10 days from the date of issue of this decision. V. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2206 CICOM/A/E/21/00073 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-05-2021 First Appeal Nos. CICOM/A/E/21/00073, CICOM/A/E/21/00074, CICOM/A/E/21/00099, CICOM/A/E/21/00100, CICOM/A/E/21/00101 & CICOM/A/E/21/00102. I. The applicant has requested information vide RTI application No. CICOM/R/E/21/00348 received by the CPIOs of the Commission on 12.04.2021 inter alia with regard to audio video records of hearings in the Commission, details of Shri Neeraj Kumar Gupta, IC & his staff and information relating to disposal of Second Appeals & complaints by him. . II. The following CPIOs of the CIC have provided point-wise replies/ information to the RTI applicant. 1)Shri SC Sharma of IC(NG) vide reply dated 26.04.2021, 2)Shri VP Singh, SO(Admn.) vide reply dated 06.05.2021, and 3)Shri SK Rabbani, DS(P&B) vide reply dated 05.05.2021 & 12.05.2021. III. In his First Appeals dated 05.05.2021 & 31.05.2021, the Appellant has mentioned that the concerned CPIO(s) had refused/denied to provide information on points 3, 5 & 6, and provided incomplete information on points 4 & 10. Complete details available in the online first appeals. IV. The First Appeal petitions, RTI application and replies given by the CPIOs have been seen. Point-3: As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. However, the CPIO (DS-P&B) is directed to revisit and give reply to the appellant in compliance with Sec.4(b)(xi) of RTI Act, 2005. Point-4: The CPIO (SO-Admn) is directed to revisit and provide information in the form as available in the records. Point-5: The CPIO (SO-Admn) is directed to revisit and provide information in compliance with Section 4(b)(x) of RTI Act 2005 with due application of Section 8(j). Point-6: The CPIO (SO-Admn) is directed to revisit and provide details of salary in compliance with section 4(b)(x) of RTI Act 2005 with due application of Section 8(j). Point-10: The CPIO (SO-Admn) is directed to revisit the reply in the light of DOPT OM No.11/2/2013-IR(Pt) dated 14.08.2013 and provide appropriate reply. The respective CPIO is directed to provide appropriate reply to the appellant within 10 days from the date of issue of this decision. V. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
2207 CICOM/A/E/21/00072 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 02-05-2021 The first appeal petition, RTI application and the information furnished by the CPIOs of CIC have been seen. The CPIO (MR), CIC is hereby directed to revisit and provide appropriate reply/information in respect of Point No.6 of the RTI application, to the appellant as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 within 10 days from the date of this decision. NA
2208 CICOM/A/E/21/00069 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 30-04-2021 Two RTI applications No. CICOM/R/T/21/00006 & CICOM/R/T/21/00005 respectively were transferred to CIC on 30.01.2021 from DOPT. The applicant sought same information (on 23 points) in both these RTI applications and the details are available online. II. Shri Ram Kumar, CPIO, CIC vide letters dated 26.02.2021 had replied both these RTI applications with similar answer viz., “No specific information pertains to Central Information Commission is sought in your above RTI application. Hence no information could be provided.” III. The appellant has submitted the first appeal on the grounds – “Refused access to Information Requested.” & “No information provided.” IV. The First Appeal petitions, RTI applications and the Replies given by the CPIO, CIC. The replies given by the CPIO are appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act 2005. As per the provision of Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. Therefore, no intervention is required in the matter. NA
2209 CICOM/A/E/21/00068 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 30-04-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर. टी. आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/T/21/00015 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (Admn) द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार ही है, इसलिय इस मामले में प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
2210 CICOM/A/E/21/00070 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 30-04-2021 I. RTI application No. CICOM/R/T/21/00003 was transferred to CIC on 30.01.2021 from DOPT for giving reply to Q.6 & 7 (page-12&13). Q.6 relates to the status of CIC order of bringing Political Parties within the ambit of RTI Act 2005 and Q.7 pertains to allotment of land in Delhi & State capitals, allotment of accommodation at concessional rates, tax exemptions and free airtime to them on All India Radio and Doordarshan. II. Shri Ram Kumar, CPIO, CIC vide letter dated 26.02.2021 had furnished information. III. The appellant has submitted the first appeal on the grounds/prayer – “Insufficient information, it was sent from VP office. Please read and reply.” IV. The First Appeal petition, RTI application and the Reply given by the CPIO, CIC. The information given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act 2005. As per the provision of Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. Therefore, no intervention is required in the matter. NA